Part 5: The Paper and my #CVofFailures
After I posted the 4th part, and as I read through it as I posted it, I realized that my argument is valid, based on the evidence I had available to me. I may not have done an exhaustive search of declassified documents, but the support is there. One complaint from one reviewer was that Breasted was “such a famous raconteur” that the content of his letters can be misleading. I absolutely agree and agree that finding other evidence would be useful here. However, his letters home were also meant as his field journals, so one might also argue that they could be taken literally. Although, if you use a field journal or field diary, you do always want to check contextual sources.
I lamented this particular source issue distinctly…
View original post 1,588 more words